Literatura:

  1. Jones L, et al. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the contact lens materials, design, and care subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 18;54(11):TFOS37-70.
  2. Pucker AD, Tichenor AA. A Review of Contact Lens Dropout. Clinical Optometry. 2020;12:85–94.
  3. Sulley A, Young G, Hunt C. Factors in the success of new contact lens wearers. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye. 2017;40(1):15–24.
  4. Sulley A, Young G, Hunt C, McCready S, Targett MT, Craven R. Retention rates in new contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(Suppl 1):S273–S282.
  5. Wolffsohn JS et al. Contact lens evidence based academic reports (CLEAR). Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44:129-131.
  6. Rosenfeld M. Computer vision syndrome (a.k.a. digital eye strain). Optometry in Practice. 2016;7(1):1-10.
  7. Rueff EM. Visual discomfort and contact lens wear: A review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Aug;46(4):101872.
  8. Coopervision data on file, 2024, Consumer segmentation online survey, Decision Analyst, August 2024. Contact lens wearers, n=3725 (n=1200 US, n=499 UK, n=503 Germany, n=500 Japan, n=350 South Korea, n=248 Poland, n=425 Italy).
  9. Dumbleton K, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D. The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation. Eye & Contact Lens. 2013 Jan;39(1):93-99.
  10. Sweeney DF. Have silicone hydrogel lenses eliminated hypoxia? Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(1):53–60.
  11. Efron N, Jones L, Bron AJ, et al. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: Report of the Contact Lens Interactions With the Ocular Surface and Adnexa Subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:TFOS98–TFOS122.
  12. Nichols JJ et al. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: Executive Summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:TFOS7–TFOS13.
  13. Rueff EM, King-Smith PE, Bailey MD. Can Binocular Vision Disorders Contribute to Contact Lens Discomfort? Optometry and Vision Science. 2015;92.
  14. Sheedy JE, Hayes J, Engle J. Is all asthenopia the same? Optometry and Vision Science. 2003;80(11):732–739.
  15. Aakre BM, Doughty MJ. Are there differences between ‚visual symptoms‘ and specific ocular symptoms associated with video display terminal (VDT) use? Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007;30(3):174-182.
  16. Maldonado-Codina C et al. The association of comfort and vision in soft toric contact lens wear. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44(4):101387. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.11.007.
  17. Richards J, Rickert M, Carr K, Meyer D, Kollbaum P. The association between participant-reported ratings of comfort, dryness and vision quality in soft contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024;44(4):693–703. doi:10.1111/opo.13292.
  18. Diec J, Naduvilath T, Tilia D, Bakaraju RC. The Relationship Between Vision and Comfort in Contact Lens Wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2021 May 1;47(5):271-276. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000743. PMID:33009260.
  19. Basuthkar Sundar Rao S, Simpson TL. Impact of Blur on Suprathreshold Scaling of Ocular Discomfort. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Apr;56(4):2304-11.
  20. Rao SB, Simpson TL. Influence of Vision on Ocular Comfort Ratings. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Aug;93(8):793-800.
  21. Day M, Strang NC, Seidel D, Gray LS. Technical Note: Effect of contact lenses on measurement of the accommodation microfluctuations. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2008;28:91-95.
  22. Campbell FW, Robson JG, Westheimer G. Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions. The Journal of Physiology. 1959;145. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006164.
  23. Charman WN, Heron G. Microfluctuations in accommodation: an update on their characteristics and possible role. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35:476–499. doi:10.1111/opo.12234.
  24. Day M, Strang NC, Seidel D, Gray LS, Mallen EAH. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2006;26(1):88–96.
  25. Kajita M. The role of accommodative function in refractive correction: Aspects of asthenopia that could be understood through medical treatment. Japanese Journal of Visual Science. 2012;33(4):138-46.
  26. Yu H, Zeng J, Li Z, Hu Y, Cui D, Zhao W, Zhao F, Yang X. Variability of Accommodative Microfluctuations in Myopic and Emmetropic Juveniles during Sustained near Work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;19(12):7066.
  27. Hynes NJ, Cufflin MP, Hampson KM, Mallen EA. The effect of image resolution of display types on accommodative microfluctuations. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 May;42(3):514-525.
  28. CVI data on file, 2024.
  29. Kajita M et al. Changes in accommodative micro-fluctuations after wearing contact lenses of different optical designs. CLAE. 2020;43(5):493-496.
  30. CVI data on file, 2016. Clinical evaluation with Biofinity Energys® and Biofinity® sphere; n=52.
  31. CVI data on file, 2018. Clinical evaluation with MyDay Energys® and MyDay® sphere, n=77.
  32. CVI data on file, 2018. Online survey Biofinity Energys® CL wearers, USA; n=200.
  33. CVI data on file, 2025.
  34. Montani G, Treso F, Martena M, et al. Effects of different contact lens design on accommodative function and eyestrain symptoms of young adult subjects after VDT use. Presented at: 2021 BCLA Virtual Clinical Conference and Exhibition; June 13-14, 2021.
  35. CVI data on file, 2018. Prospective, multi-center (5 US sites), open label, bilateral wear, one week dispensing study with MyDay and MyDay Energys. N=77 habitual soft CL wearers.
  36. CVI data on file, 2018. Prospective, multi-center (5 US sites), open label, bilateral wear, one week dispensing study with MyDay Energys. N=77 habitual soft CL wearers. When asked, ‚CLs make my eyes feel less strained‘ (slightly agree/agree/strongly agree).
  37. CVI data on file, 2018. Prospective, multi-center (5 US sites), open label, bilateral wear, one week dispensing study with MyDay Energys. N=77 habitual soft CL wearers. 80% of patients agreed when asked ‚CLs make my eyes feel less tired‘ (slightly agree/agree/strongly agree).
  38. Walsh K et al. Using computational optical modelling to better understand the clinical performance of a contact lens (CL) with a novel optical design. Poster BCLA conference, Birmingham, June 2025.
  39. CVI data on file, 2023. US in-market assessment survey conducted by ECPs: N=207 habitual contact lens patients refit into MyDay Energys® contact lenses after one week of daily wear.
  40. CVI data on file, 2023. US in-market assessment survey conducted by 23 ECPs: n=207 habitual contact lens patients refit into MyDay Energys® contact lenses after one week of daily wear. ECP’s Top 2 Box: 100%.