Literatura:

[1] Zadnik K., Barr J. T., Edrington T. B., et al. Baseline findings in the CollaborativeLongitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Dec 1998;39(13):2537–46. [PubMed: 9856763]

[2] Mas Tur V., MacGregor C., Jayaswal R., O’Brart D., Maycock N. (2017) A review ofkeratoconus: Diagnosis, pathophysiology, and genetics. Surv Ophthalmol 62:770–783

[3] SeitzB (2016) Stadiengerechte Therapie des Keratokonus (Editorial). KlinMonatsblAugenheilkd 233:692–694

[4] Pullum, W., K., Whiting, A., M., & Buckley, J., R. (2005). Scleral contact lenses: Theexpanding role. Cornea, 24(3), 269-277. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000148311.94180.6b

[5] DeNaeyer G. et al. Qualitative Assessment of Scleral Shape Patterns Using a New WideField Ocular Surface Elevation Topographer. J Cont Lens Res Sci Vol 1(1):12-22; 2017

[6] DeNaeyer G. et al. Correlation of Corneal and Scleral Topography in Cases with Ectasiasand Normal Corneas. J Cont Lens Res Sci 3(1):e10-e20; 2019

[7] Kumar P., Carrasquillo K. G., Chaudhary S. and Basu S. A multi-parameter gradingsystem for optimal fitting of scleral contact lenses [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:6 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.74638.1)

[8] Vincent S. J., Alonso-Caneiro D., Collins M. J.: Optical coherence tomography and scleralcontact lenses: clinical and research applications. Clin Exp Optom. 2019; 102(3): 224–241